An Uprateability Risk Assessment Methodology

Uprating is a process to assess the ability of a part to meet the functionality and performance requirements of the applications in which the part is used outside the manufacturers’ specification range. However, uprating can be an expensive and time consuming process. There is also no guarantee that all parts can be successfully uprated. In 2002, some electronic part manufacturers began releasing a category of parts considered to be “closer” to military-grade parts, called “Enhanced Plastic (EP)“…

Author: Mishra, Rajeev Kumar

Source: University of Maryland

Download Link: Click Here To Download This Report (PDF)

Reference URL 1: Visit Now

Reference URL 2: Visit Now

Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Uprating: Today’s Need?
1.2 Why is Uprating Possible?
1.3 Absolute Maximum Rating (AMR)
1.4 Recommended Operating Conditions (ROC) Rating
1.5 Associating ROC to Reliability
1.6 Associating AMR to Part Performance
1.7 Summary
Chapter 2: Enhanced Plastic Parts: A Viable Alternative To Uprating?
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Analysis
2.2.1 Controlled Baseline
2.2.2 Enhanced Product Change Notification
2.2.3 Extended Temperature Ratings
2.2.4 Qualification Pedigree
2.2.5 Performance Assurance
2.2.6 Part Identification
2.2.7 Enhanced Obsolescence Management
2.2.8 Alternative to Uprating
2.2.9 Cost-Effective Alternative
2.3 Conclusions
Chapter 3: Uprateability Risk Assessment Methodology
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Uprateability Risk Assessment Methodology
3.3.1 Collection of Necessary Information: Step – 1
3.3.1 Analysis of Information: Step – 2
3.2.3 Uprateability Risk Level Assignment: Step – 3
3.3 Summary
Chapter 4: Uprateability Risk Assessment Case Study – I
4.1 Collection of Necessary Information: Step – 1
4.2 Analysis of Information: Step – 2
4.3 Uprateability Risk Level Assignment: Step – 3
4.4 Uprating of Risk Level 2 Operational Amplifier
4.5 Uprateability Risk Classification: Based on Technology and Part Type
4.6 Conclusions
Chapter 5: Uprateability Risk Assessment Case Study – II
5.1 Capacitor Terminologies
5.2 Polyethylene Terepthalate (PET) Film Capacitor
5.3 Uprateability Risk Assessment of Polyethylene Terepthalate (PET) Film Capacitor
5.3.1 Collection of Necessary Information: Step – 1
5.3.2 Analysis of Information: Step – 2
5.3.3 Uprateability Risk Level Assignment: Step – 3
5.4 Uprating of Risk Level 3 PET Capacitor
5.4.1 Effect of Temperature on Electrical Characteristics of PET Capacitor
5.4.2 Effect of Frequency on Electrical Characteristics of PET Capacitor
5.4.3 Effect of Voltage on Electrical Characteristics of PET Capacitor
5.5 A Statistical Model for PET Capacitor
5.6 Conclusions
Chapter 6: Uprateability Risk Assessment Case Study – III
6.1 Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS) Film Capacitor
6.2 Uprateability Risk Assessment of Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS) Film Capacitor
6.2.1 Collection of Necessary Information: Step – 1
6.2.2 Analysis of Information: Step – 2
6.2.3 Uprateability Risk Level Assignment: Step – 3
6.3 Uprating of Risk Level 1 PPS Capacitor
6.3.1 Effect of Temperature on Electrical Characteristics of PPS Capacitor
6.3.2 Effect of Frequency on Electrical Characteristics of PPS Capacitor
6.4 Effect of Voltage on Electrical Characteristics of PPS Capacitor
6.5 A Statistical Model for PPS Capacitor
6.6 Conclusions
Contributions
APPENDIX: A80
APPENDIX: B94
APPENDIX: C96
APPENDIX: D97
APPENDIX: E

Leave a Comment