Physical inactivity is usually a key reason for diminished quality of life, in addition to several common diseases and even early death. The majority of people, throughout the world, are rarely physically active. As a result, physical inactivity affects the burden of disease, and raises its societal costs. In view of this, it is crucial to ask how healthcare need to respond when the population and the patients are either non-active or hardly physically active. Cost-effectiveness analyses of the promotion of physical activity in health care can play a role substantially to health care policy. The actual purpose of this dissertation was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of physical activity promotion in the health care system. The specific goals were: (I) to offer a model for examining cost-effectiveness and equity in health for community-promoted physical activity, (II) to analyze existing knowledge about the cost-effectiveness of healthcare based interventions directed at bettering physical activity, (III) to observe the cost effectiveness of physical activity promotion as a treatment solution in primary health care, (IV) to demonstrate the significance of enjoyment of exercise in interventions targeted at promoting physical activity, and (V) to explain an approach to valuing the time spent on exercise.
Contents: Cost-effectiveness of the promotion of physical activity in health care
1) Background
1.1 Physical activity and health
1.2 Physical activity in the population
1.3 Physical inactivity and illness in the population
1.4 Physical inactivity and societal costs
1.5 Methods of promoting physical activity
1.6 Economic evaluation of promoting physical activity
1.7 Policies for priorities in health care
2) Aims
3) Materials and methods
3.1 Methods for developing an economic and equity analysis model (paper I)
3.2 Review method of cost-effectiveness of health care based interventions (paper II)
3.3 Analysis methods for a primary health care based trial (paper III)
3.4 Evaluation methods for analysis the impact of enjoyment of exercise (paper IV)
3.5 Methods for estimating costs of time spent on exercise (paper V)
4) Results
4.1 A 0model for analysis of community based interventions (paper I)
4.2 Cost-effectiveness of 6 health care based interventions (paper II)
4.3 Cost-effectiveness of a primary health care based trial (paper III)
4.4 The importance of enjoyment of exercise in interventions (paper IV)
4.5. Costs of time spent on exercise (paper V)
5) Discussion
5.1 Better analysis of interventions is possible (paper I)
5.2 Physical activity promotion in health care is cost-effective in many cases (paper II)
5.3 Treating with physical activity promotion in primary health care may be cost-effective (paper III)
5.4. Enhanced enjoyment of exercise has impact on effectiveness (paper IV)
5.5. Costs of time spent on exercise are important for cost-effectiveness (paper V)
5.6 Main fndings
5.7. Consideration of methods used
5.8. The need for further research
6) Policy conclusions in the Swedish context….
Source: Umea University
Download URL 2: Visit Now